My opinion, same as it always was:  the tav can’t have a dagesh if a vowel 
(even a sheva!) precedes it.  And it does have a dagesh, so ...

Regards to all from Joan

Sent from my iPad

> On Apr 11, 2018, at 3:51 PM, Shinohara, Jasmin <> wrote:
> I would think it’s the latter, but there are many records (PCC and DLC) with 
> the former. There is a sheva under the dalet and the taf has a dagesh and a 
> hirik (מוֹלַדְתִּי). As far as I can tell the sheva is not na’ (and if it’s 
> merahef, it’s also disregarded per romanization rules), so then why the e 
> after the d? We’ve long established that pronunciation is not the arbiter, 
> the vocalization is, so what am I missing?
> Thanks, Jasmin
> ---
> Jasmin Shinohara
> Hebraica Cataloging Librarian
> University of Pennsylvania
> Van Pelt-Dietrich Library Center
> 3420 Walnut Street
> Philadelphia, PA 19104-6206
> T. 215-746-6397
> _______________________________________________
> Heb-naco mailing list
Heb-naco mailing list

Reply via email to