My opinion, same as it always was: the tav can’t have a dagesh if a vowel (even a sheva!) precedes it. And it does have a dagesh, so ...
Regards to all from Joan Sent from my iPad > On Apr 11, 2018, at 3:51 PM, Shinohara, Jasmin <jsh...@pobox.upenn.edu> wrote: > > I would think it’s the latter, but there are many records (PCC and DLC) with > the former. There is a sheva under the dalet and the taf has a dagesh and a > hirik (מוֹלַדְתִּי). As far as I can tell the sheva is not na’ (and if it’s > merahef, it’s also disregarded per romanization rules), so then why the e > after the d? We’ve long established that pronunciation is not the arbiter, > the vocalization is, so what am I missing? > > Thanks, Jasmin > > --- > Jasmin Shinohara > Hebraica Cataloging Librarian > University of Pennsylvania > Van Pelt-Dietrich Library Center > 3420 Walnut Street > Philadelphia, PA 19104-6206 > T. 215-746-6397 > jsh...@upenn.edu > > _______________________________________________ > Heb-naco mailing list > Heb-naco@lists.osu.edu > https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
_______________________________________________ Heb-naco mailing list Heb-naco@lists.osu.edu https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
