On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 11:26:42AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 10:20:54AM +0200, Shoshannah Forbes wrote: > > This time in Maariv: > > http://images.maariv.co.il/channels/13/ART/597/151.html
One other point: This review and other reviews claim that OOo is far from being perfect because of bad support at importing MS-Office documents. Having OOo compete with MS-Office 2003 on MS-Office 2003 documents is hopeless, of course. But how do the two compare with documents created by older versions of MS-Office? And what about older versions of MS-Office reading documents created by OOo vs MS-Office 2003? -- Tzafrir Cohen +---------------------------+ http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir/ |vim is a mutt's best friend| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +---------------------------+
