Hi Tzafrir, Isn't it odd that MS Office is "Ok" even though it does not import StarOffice/OpenOffice documents at all, but StarOffice/OpenOffice is "far from being perfect" because it does not import MS Office documents perfectly? There is a lack of symmetry here, no?
The real issue is whether or not OpenOffice is a good office productivity tool by itself. Regards, - yba On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 11:26:42AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 10:20:54AM +0200, Shoshannah Forbes wrote: > > > This time in Maariv: > > > http://images.maariv.co.il/channels/13/ART/597/151.html > > One other point: This review and other reviews claim that OOo is far > from being perfect because of bad support at importing MS-Office > documents. > > Having OOo compete with MS-Office 2003 on MS-Office 2003 documents is > hopeless, of course. But how do the two compare with documents created > by older versions of MS-Office? > > And what about older versions of MS-Office reading documents created by > OOo vs MS-Office 2003? > > -- EE 77 7F 30 4A 64 2E C5 83 5F E7 49 A6 82 29 BA ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
