‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Am 9. März 2018 5:41 PM schrieb Dmitry Alexandrov <[email protected]>:
> > > For now, I took a liberty to move it back to [email protected] by > > > > > > resending your message and continuing there. > > > > Right, thanks for that. I'm not used to using maillists, this is why > > > > I'm prone to clicking on "reply" instead of "reply all". > > Yes, I always wondered, why so many MUAs tend to make ‘reply to sender only’ > easier to press rather that ‘follow-up’ / ‘reply to all’. Even not in context > of a mailing list, the former is needed much rarely than the latter, if not > to say that is almost never needed. > > If your MUA is one of these, rebinding them vice versa might be helpful. It's more an issue of me not being used to mail lists. > > > > Sounds nice. I would definitely like to see it, when it’s published > > > > > > (in the case it’s in English or Russian). > > > > English, Russian and German. The site is going to have all 3 > > > > languages. > > Pardon another unasked advice, but in such case separate feeds for them would > be highly desirable. (Even if meta-tags are set correctly.) Thanks for the advice, but this is getting quite offtopic now. I think, the original question is resolved - one option for creating a website that will respect the users freedom turns out to be a static site generator (like jekyll). > Thanks, I was not aware of that. Jekyll as of https://jekyllrb.com is still > strictly focused on static builds, though, as far as I see. That is their basis of course, but they do offer plugins that allow much more. Some of them include javascript, some don't. A global search function is another example of a jekyll plugin that makes it much more like a "real" CMS. It's all in their "docs" section of the website. Also, running jekyll in "watch" mode, will make it re-generate the static content each time the source content has changed. This will make it look very much dynamic even without extra plugins.
