%% "Shah, Bijal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: sb> I agree, though I have mixed feelings about a lisp-like [Scheme] sb> language being the scripting language. I've used lisp in the dim sb> and distant past and I've found many C/C++/Java programmers don't sb> get to grips with it easily. It might prove to be more of a sb> barrier to acceptance than expected.
That might be true, but Lisp is really a very good language for a make scripting language, since much of make's behavior, at least in terms of expansion of variables, etc. is somewhat Lisp-like already. sb> Is a make incorporating scripting likely to be 4.00? I don't know whether I'll bump the version to 4.00 for that or not. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist _______________________________________________ Help-make mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
