But what you say sounds interesting. I'll have a closer look at it as soon as the time-consuming projects I'm working at right now are over...
On Apr 8, 3:22 pm, justindz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think using Basic HTTP Authentication with base64 encoding is > probably not as secure as this could be and given what I've seen from > Pownce and Twhirl and the like, there might be a way to authenticate a > session and just use the session rather than providing basic auth on > each call. I'm in Marketing, so it's just an itch rather than an > intelligently proposed solution ;-) > > On Apr 8, 8:53 am, Athravan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What do you mean would be a cleaner way? > > > On Apr 7, 4:12 pm, justindz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I am absolutely convinced that there are cleaner ways to do these > > > things, but they seem to be stable, relatively secure and I have > > > bigger fish to fry for the moment. If you (or I) improve on them, > > > please post. AIR seems like a great technology for client-izing bits > > > of a Heroku app especially given that you can use Prototype and > > > Scriptaculous on the inside. > > > > On Apr 6, 1:25 pm, Athravan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Yeah, sounds really interesting, since I also think about a project > > > > combinig AIR and Heroku (some sort of game)... When I start > > > > developing that I'll for sure have to look back to this thread. > > > > > Daniel > > > > > On Apr 6, 5:45 am, "Adam Wiggins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Great stuff Justin, thanks! > > > > > > Adam --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Heroku" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
