Now a quick question. Esa M. recommended them but aren't they guitar amps?
It was also recommended not to use a guitar amp.
Is that saying that it is ok to start with but, being a guitar amp, is not
ideal?
I can see real benefits from an amp that can use 6 AA batteries as well as a
mains adaptor and, at the price, looks pretty good (and the weight too,
considering my bad back).
Colin Hill
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Oscar Picazo Ruiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: [HG] about amps


> Hello,
>
> I've got one of those microcubes, good to start, and try effects, and the
> like. Very simple staff but good for a try (and cheap...)
>
> 2006/6/9, Esa M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Hello.
> >
> > Unorthodox recommendations for beginners:
> > - Roland microcube -small, CHEAP, proper effects, basic amp modellings
> > - some used mixer-amp+ speakers -usually cheap, many channels,
> > usually proper eq, maybe effects too. But take some expert with you
> > to test the unit!
> > - active pa- or studio-nearfield monitor - one box is all you need,
> > no knobfields to hassle with... This is also expandable system and
> > has many uses.
> >
> > I do not recommend guitar amps, they are designed for guitars =too
> > much middle-frequencies. Even (modern) bass-amps are better.
> >
>


Reply via email to