At 08:01 PM 7/26/2006 +0100, you wrote:

Hi
To guess at a single cause of all the problems mentioned, I'd be inclined to blame heat and low humidity. I've just got back from the oven they call SaintChartier and noticed the geometry of my gurdies changing almost by the hour. As you say, shimming works fine on chanterelles - you need thicker shims for bourdons because of the different approach to the wheel. The trompette can't be shimmed effectively so the best thing is to make a taller one for use whenever the problem arises. Hot weather also makes rosin more sticky and could be affecting the drone pitch. Try a harder rosin.
Neil



Hi Neil!

You suggested "heat and low humidity"; we don't get that combination much in this part of the US. Did you mean *high* humidity? It's not too terribly hot or humid right now here where I live on the coast. I use a very hard, light colored violin rosin, and I don't know if I can get a harder one.

But I'm interested in your idea about using a taller chien. Are you suggesting a taller chien in order to reduce the pressure of the string against the wheel? I ask because a taller chien could be made to accomplish this, but it would also increase the downward force of the chien against the soundboard. Why not a chien the same height as the current one, but with the slot cut a little further from the plane of the edge of the wheel? This may be splitting hairs, but I'm asking because in the discussion about this problem a couple of years ago, there was confusion about string angle in relation to the wheel edge and in relation to the soundboard.

As I recall, Marcello suggested that the location of the string anchor point would have an effect: the further away the anchor point is from the centerline of the instrument, the more the tirant has to pull the string to adjust the "buzzing" point of the chien. This angle of the string at the chien relative to the instrument's vertical plane (perpendicular to the soundboard) could affect the pitch. This is interesting because in theory it doesn't effect the angle of the string relative to the wheel edge, and therefore it doesn't effect the pressure of the string against the wheel.

Theo found that if he pushed a piece of cut-off pencil eraser under the string near the anchor point, the pitch change could be varied; he changed the angle of the string at the chien relative to the instrument's horizontal plane (parallel to the soundboard).

But both Theo and I noticed that the pitch of the string only changed when the chien was actually in motion, buzzing. While maintaining a steady wheel turning speed, I found that if I held down the chien to prevent the tapping movement, the pitch did not drop. Releasing the chien and allowing it to buzz caused the pitch to drop again. This led to the possibility that the string's effective vibrating length is actually increasing while the chien is buzzing, which makes sense to me: when the chien is at rest, the string's vibrating length is clearly between the ear and the chien. But when the chien is moving *with* the string (buzzing), then it's not so clear: the ear is still one end of the vibrating length, but the other end may end up effectively being not the chien, but the anchor point at the end of the instrument, or more likely, due to the damping effect of the tirant's "sideways" tension, some point between the chien and the anchor point. Which leads me to wonder about whether changing the mass of the chien could effect the pitch change. Maybe, but the current chien worked perfectly well before; its mass hasn't changed. This makes a strong argument for a string pressure/tension issue. My brain hurts.

Has anyone given any further thought or study to this issue of the vibrating length when one end of the string isn't always firmly anchored?

~ Matt


--------------------------------------------------------------------
Matthew Szostak - Hurdy-Gurdies
7 Grove Street
Camden, Maine  04843
phone: 207-236-9576
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
website: http://www.midcoast.com/~beechhil/vielle
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to