For an alternative portable, and programmable tuner check:

  http://www.turbo-tuner.com/

Frankie Sierra

Ernic Kamerich wrote:

I agree with Neil that, when tuning strings of a hg pure to each other in a noisy environment, an electronic tuner (build in or used with a contact microphon) can be a great help and may give better results than tuning by ear beause of the noise. That works if you have learned the properties of your tuner by tuning by ear and see what your tuner does. I know that I get a pure fifth with my simple tuner exactly at the point where it doubts between pure( green led) or too high (right red led).

For tuning the tangents I need my ears, a quiet environment and no tuner, but a programmable tuner could be helpful. At present I know only one brand for a programmable tuner: Peterson (StroboFlip); it seems that Korg has discontinued making such things, although they make a tuner with a choice of some temperaments, including natural harmonic temperament, and in my opinion that is the only thing you need for a hg. Best and cheapest idea seems to be using tuning software on the computer.

Forget Kirnberger, Valotti, mean tone temperament and other baroque tunings: they have been conceived for harmony, for changing chords and changing tonalities, not for drone music. They make as little sense for a hg as equal temperament.

And yes, Neil, you are almost right: this natural harmonic tuning makes things worse, or even terrible, with different drones, generally. But it works (almost) perfectly if only two drones a fifth or a fourth apart are used, for instance only G and c or only G and d. Details and explanations can be found in my article on tuning the tangents:
      http://www.orfeo-fiato.nl/hurdy_gurdy_tuning.html

Tuning your hg in something like natural harmonic temperament may conflict or not with other players/singers. If you are really playing drone music, there should not be a conflict. But, for instance, playing with a melodion or a guitar, the conflicts are already intrinsic to the combination of a drone and a harmony instrument; so, why not give it a try in such a case as well?

Ernic
----------------

2007/12/10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:

    Hi all

    I feel the need to defend the onboard ( or any other type) electronic
    tuner.

    Its main function of course is to give a visual confirmation that
    your open
    string is in tune -very useful anytime but particularly in a session.

    Having this indication at the flick of a switch is far more
    convenient than
    fumbling around with hand held units or having to repeatedly
    attach the clip
    on type.

    The onboard tuner will usually take its signal direct from a
    transducer in
    the instrument so it gets a much purer signal.

    Getting both chanterelles in perfect unison is also more simple done
    visually , particularly if there are other drone instruments
    tuning up at
    the time.

    The other point is that many accompanying instruments - all the
    fretted
    instruments, keyboards and melodeons for instance - are normally
    tuned in
    equal temperament and if you routinely play with these
    instruments, your
    carefully set up intonation is just a bit out.

    I suppose it all comes down to what you want to play on the
    hurdy-gurdy.
    General playing for fun with other musicians would seem to suit equal
    temperament and the purists have every right to embrace any tuning
    standard
    that they choose.

    IMHO, life's too short to agonise over the finer points
    of  Kirnberger II
    and Valotti ( no offence Simon ). It takes immense skill to give
    every note
    exactly the same pressure and unless this is achieved, the notes
    are always
    going to vary in pitch by a tiny amount each time they are played.

    The Wittman tuner I use to build in has indicators for sharp and
    flat of
    equal temperament, these flash at an increasing rate as the pitch
    differs
    from equal. The rate of flashing is an indicator of the degree of
    shift.
    Four flashes per second, for instance indicates a ten cent
    deviation so it's
    not hard to work out where you need to be.

    Correct me if I'm wrong but it seems to me that if the tangents
    are set to
    play in D, surely larger errors will be apparent when you change
    to playing
    in G, Am etc.

    Best wishes for Christmas and the New Year

    Neil
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Simon Wascher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
    To: <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 10:12 AM
    Subject: Re: [HG] Building Questions: onboard tuners


    > Hello,
    >
    > Am 05.12.2007 um 23:18 schrieb John Tappan:
    >> Three, a number of instruments are being built with
    onboard  electronic
    >> tuners.  It works nicely on my guitar, I'd think that  with
    some 46 or so
    >> tangents, it could be a big help in getting set up.
    >
    > there are two purposes for the onboard tuner. First is to find and
    > control the pich of the open string, really helpful.
    > Second is to tune the tangents. To tune the the tangent pitches
    well  you
    > will need a tuner that is capable of at least one or the other  non
    > equally tempered scales, like Kirnberger II, Valotti, ... or
    one  that
    > allows to reprogram its scale to the needed.
    >
    > Most small tuners that you might find nice to build in support
    modern
    > standard equal temperament pitches only. If you find a
    small  reprogamable
    > one, please let me know...
    >
    > Simon
    >
    >
    > ---
    > have a look at:
    > http://hurdygurdywiki.wiki-site.com
    > http://drehleierwiki.wiki-site.com
    > ---
    > my site:
    > http://simonwascher.info <http://simonwascher.info>
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > --
    > No virus found in this incoming message.
    > Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database:
    > 269.16.17/1178 - Release Date: 08/12/2007 11:59
    >
    >



Reply via email to