On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:43:29 +0200, Christian Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:

except users using that .count() patch won't have a migration path to 3.x
in the near future.

Sure, they will have to implement the new API then. Whats the difference between replacing a handwritten hack/workaround or a deprecated count() method?



you got a point - but it just feel weird to have us add a most-wanted feature
to a 2.1.x release when we don't want to add new features to that branch + releasing
a H3 that won't have that .count() ...or do you plan to apply it to H3 too ?



-- Max Rydahl Andersen callto://max.rydahl.andersen

Hibernate
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hibernate.org

JBoss Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jboss.com


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
hibernate-devel mailing list
hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel

Reply via email to