What pleas? We are working on an update to get the code base to compile under VS.NET 2005, this should help with GCC 4.x also.
- Alfred Ondrej Hošek wrote: > It went along the lines of "make it compile", "copy server_i486.so > over > to the server" and "./srcds_run". Purely trial-and-error. Seems like > the > ABI differences are minimal, if any. (I hope it'll stay that way for > the > next few versions.) > > If Valve decides to move to GCC 4, I'm ready to trade a .diff file > for a "thank you" (and maybe the right to brag about having been > helpful ;-)). > As I said, I just need to try compiling with Microsoft's C++ compiler > first, since it's not my objective to destroy things for one group > just > to make them work for the other. (At least not in this case.) > > Any chances of my two pleas having been heard by the "higher powers"? > > Have a nice day, > ~~ Ondra Hosek > > Alfred Reynolds wrote: >> The C++ ABI differs in GCC 4.x from GCC 3.x, last time I tried it >> was not possible to run a mod compiled with 4.x (as C++ interfaces >> are passed from it to our GCC 3.x compiled binaries). How did you >> solve that? >> >> - Alfred >> >> Ondrej Hošek wrote: >> >>> Greetings to fellow list members, >>> >>> Recently, I have managed to coerce the code released with the >>> Half-Life 2 SDK to compile on Linux with GCC 4.0.2 without >>> -fpermissive and with -Wall -Werror (both "mod" and "plugin" >>> targets). I will release this modified code later on after >>> incorporating the changes of the upcoming SDK beta and ensuring >>> that the code still compiles with Microsoft's C++ compiler. >>> > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
