PS: from my last post: Of course if you have a P4 and 2003, HT would only improve things.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guido Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 3:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003? You guys keep going back and forth. He just wanted to know which one to choose. He didn't want to know if they used HT or not. You keep going back and forth... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Napier, Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 3:41 PM Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003? > 2000 vs 2003 if cost is a non issue use 2003. > As for hlds it really makes very little difference. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Roc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 3:30 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003? > > > If cost is NOT an issue would 2003 then be the way to go? > > I'm asking because I was going to try 2003 and now want to be sure to > I'm making the right decision. > > Regards > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Napier, Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 2:05 PM > Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003? > > > > I think you mean 'making it expensive..' not useless. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Steven Hartland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:07 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003? > > > > > > Not true as far as I know it isn't hyperthread "aware" but that > > doesn't stop u using it. The difference is that the scheduler it > > will treat the logical CPU's as real CPU's and as we all know this > > isn't the case. > > The result is that it "may" not extract as good as performance as a > > hyperthread aware OS like Windows XP or 2003 server. > > > > The fact remains though that 2003 is still a "server" OS and as such > > is priced accordingly making it useless for running legal game servers. > > > > Steve / K > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "K. Mike Bradley" > > > > > Nope, 2000 does not support Hyperthreading. This feature must be > > > turned of in the bios to load and run 2000. > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
