Run hldsupdatetool. read teh hldsupdatetool.txt. and creat a shortcut to
hldsupdatetool.exe, right click/properties and click in the shirtcut tab,
were it says target after hldsupdatetool.exe put the parameters you want and
then run it. if you run hldsupdatetool from
run>cmd>hldsupatetool.exe -parameters you will get teh message that you can
not overwrite hldsupatetool.exe very common problem
----- Original Message ----- hereFrom: "{r$r} || mAlFuNcTiOn /RRCLAN.NET"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> not to cut this particular thread but, anyone out there help on this
> topic???
>
> got suggestion to download hlds server download from steampowered.com if i
> intend to run the specialists 2.1 mod for halflife.
> i can run it if i launch a switch in the executable file
hlds.exe -ts -port
> 27015 -noipx +log on +maxplayers 10
> however through steam i get the famous "protocol is older than" 46 vs 47
> steammessage, can anyone elaborate on steps to get ts 2.1 running
dedicated
> server on steam???
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Napier, Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 9:07 PM
> Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
>
>
> > Yes service pack 4 did address as I recall one tiny issue with HT.
> > win2k however does not take advantage of HT reguardless. I think
someone
> > mentioned that it didn't 'support' it, what they meant was it didn't
take
> > advantage of it, not that there were problems with in on win2k.
> >
> > Not sure really why we're talking about this as HT doesn't help hlds
much
> if
> > at all, infact there was some discussion last year on this list that
> seemed
> > to indicate it hurt more then helped. (now if your running hlds and many
> > other items on the box..yeah it might help you.)
> >
> > btw intel does not go around telling people to disable HT on win2k
boxes,
> > that's not to say however that in same rare cases it can be benificial,
> such
> > as dedicated gaming server systems.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Fencik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 8:36 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> >
> >
> > I thought this was addressed in one of the service packs. Why anyone
> > would want to run hyperthreading for gameservers is a mystery to me.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of K. Mike Bradley
> > Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 10:38 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> >
> > Intel says to disable HT if u run w2k. There are know issues. The code
> > IS
> > not optimized for HT ... HT did not exist when w2k was written.
> > I had problems with my new dell server running w2k and Dell told me to
> > disable.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guido
> > Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 10:27 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> >
> > In Greg's post it didn't state if Win2kPro supported HT. Does it?
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "[YG]Sharza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 8:36 AM
> > Subject: SV: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> >
> >
> > > > nope, 2k does not support hyperthreading
> > > Yes it does, but you would require a version licensed for more
> > > processors
> > than would make sense
> > > comparing cost to performance.
> > >
> > > > as for whoever said xp for win servers, i would like u to send me
> > > > some
> > of
> > > > that fine jamacian weed you're smoking, cuz im out at the moment.
> > > You have no clue what you are talking about, get your knowledge to a
> > reasonable level, and point out
> > > the facts on which you build your above statement. If not, quit
> > > insulting
> > people by being
> > > "better-knowing" when in fact you are immensely wrong!
> > >
> > > Stick with Greg's post, as he is right, and everybody stating anything
> > else is wrong! Obviously
> > > somebody denies the facts in this thread.
> > >
> > > For my part, it's closed, he's questions have been answered, and again
> > this has gone way too far off
> > > original topic!
> > >
> > > L8r,
> > > Sharza
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > > Version: 6.0.706 / Virus Database: 462 - Release Date: 14-06-2004
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please visit:
> > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
