I couldn't agree more. :)
On Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:48 AM [GMT-06:00], Roc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Spoken like a true hack! ;) > > Regards > > Fred - Prism128 wrote: > >> well the server would have to have VAC2 turned on (i think)? apart >> from that >> i dunno. >> >> erm, IMO, cheaters should be given a warning, like a little popup, >> client-side, that says "VAC2 caught ur cheat, do it again and ur >> banned", and maybe a temporary ban of 1 week... cos some people just >> do not listen to >> warnings... this would also help if, say, a friend, relative or >> whoever put >> a cheat on ur CSS without you knowing... kinda unfair to >> instant-perm-ban in >> my opinion... ;-) >> >> -------------------- >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Pawel Dabrowski >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 1:32 PM >> Subject: RE: [hlds] Suggestion for VAC2. >> >> >> Anyone know if server admins will know if someone was banned on their >> server >> or not? >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alexander >> Kobbevik >> Sent: 30 March 2005 12:03 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [hlds] Suggestion for VAC2. >> >> >> I been away from this list for a while and after seeing the last >> update notice I ran back. >> >> Can I make a suggestion for VAC2, please? >> >> I know its only fair to warn before inserting a new system that will >> try to >> catch cheaters. >> I also know that it's the right way to do it when you are acctually >> trying >> to get more players, and not less. >> >> But, here goes. >> >> What if you update VAC2... but only record cheats until the next >> update. Then you ban the collected list and start a new recording >> after the >> new VAC2 >> update. >> This way you create a fear for cheating... which is one of the most >> successfull ways of stopping people from trying to cheat... >> >> They can't just have someone else check if the cheat gets detected >> first, then use it until the next VAC2 update. >> >> To me this sounds like a really good idea, but it popped up an hour >> ago while reading the archive.. so maybe I missed some side affect... >> >> If people comment on this idea, maybe valve will consider it? >> >> >> -Alexander >> [GNIZ] _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
