ping isn't latency, ping is there and back. latency is here to there, the time it takes your command to reach the server
On 7/19/05, Whisper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -- > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > Can somebody please explain why the latency measurements for: > The Scoreboard > Net_graph 3 > Stats & rcon stats > Are 3 completely different and unrelated numbers, all purporting to be > measuring latency (ping) of the players connection. > As a rule of thumb, it appears (but I could be wrong and it could just be > me) that the scoreboard ping is always the lowest, > net_graph 3 ping is twice that of the scoreboard > stats & rcon stats it twice that of net_graph 3. > The only thing that makes sense is the scoreboard latency, which seems to > be for the most part, a reasonably accurate reflection of what your latency > is if you measured it with a cmdline ping in Windows. > Anyhow, if somebody could provide a accurate logical explanation as to why > these 3 latency measurements are completely different and why, it would be > much appreciated. > Cheers > -- > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > -- Clayton Macleod _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
