Just curious, but how many people have used both. These fights are starting to sound like all the other fan boy fights like windows or Linux, Intel or AMD, NVIDIA or ati. In most of those cases I've found a lot of people have only used one product for so long that they get attached and no matter what think it's better, where I have found that it all depends on what you want to do one will be better in some instances and in others the other is better, and ultimately they both are really close and it's which you prefer based on your criteria.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clayton Macleod Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 12:52 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [hlds] Web server like I said, both camps claim better performance. You just happen to be in the IIS camp. There are just as many in the apache camp that show apache performing better. The fact that you were able to get better performance out of IIS doesn't necessarily mean anything more than you have more IIS knowledge... On 8/5/05, James Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > putting one name before the other. Frankly, screw that. I have > deployed BOTH (no names required this time) in very high volume and > very low volume environments. One product has outperformed the other > IN BOTH scenarios depending on the final layer of development that WE > put on top. -- Clayton Macleod _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
