--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
As I said previously, it's the hosting companies rules. I'm pretty sure they 
block port 3389 and we don't want to risk breaking their acceptable use 
policy.> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected]> Subject: Re: 
[hlds] Windows Equivalent of Dynamic ticks in Linux?> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 
08:20:52 +0000> > Gigabit Nick wrote:> > but (going back to the original start 
of this thread fork) if there> > was a solution to limit the manipulation of 
the high precision timer> > to srcds and not make it system wide it would be 
good for us.> > No and there never will be because you are changing the 
scheduler> frequency and that will always affect the entire machine.> > If you 
have VNC access there should be nothing to stop you enabling> RDP access then 
turning off VNC, might want to speak to your host> about this as well see if 
they are willing to change their policy as> I cant see why anyone would want to 
use VNC anymore.> >     Steve> > > 
================================================> This e.mail is private and 
confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is 
addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from 
using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information 
contained in it.> > In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete 
transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337> or return the E.mail to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> > > _______________________________________________> To 
unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
_________________________________________________________________
Explore the seven wonders of the world
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=7+wonders+world&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE
--

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to