I'm not sure why you sent me a private e-mail apart from the hlds mailing list but this is the reply I sent the last thing you said was "CS 1.4 didn't have VAC. Nice attempt at a troll though" CS 1.4 had VAC you sure are very knowledgeable so much for being a mod at steam forum (mods are all just volunteers anyway, not trained or anything)
--- On Sun, 6/1/08, Shawn Zipay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Shawn Zipay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [hlds] tf2 exploits/hacks To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sunday, June 1, 2008, 9:12 AM CS 1.4 didn't have VAC. Nice attempt at a troll though. And how do I know? Let's see, I used to be a mod on the Steam forums and I still run a community site that grants me access to speaking with Valve staff members on a regular basis. How do I know? Put 2 and 2 together. On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 10:29 PM, JDoc0512 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: and what makes you think that you have a better understanding of VAC than I do? care to explain how VAC was like back in cs 1.4? that's of course if you have any experience running cs servers back then --- On Sat, 5/31/08, Shawn Zipay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Shawn Zipay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [hlds] tf2 exploits/hacks To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Saturday, May 31, 2008, 1:37 PM I don't believe you have much of an understanding how VAC works then for you to make that request/claim then. On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 8:47 AM, JDoc0512 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: that means make it more secure so that it can detect more hacks faster and better but your question is pointless -- Shawn Zipay CS-Nation http://www.csnation.net -- Shawn Zipay CS-Nation _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
