hats off man that's an ace idea :) -------------------------------------------------- From: "Spencer 'voogru' MacDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 9:50 PM To: "'Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list'" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [hlds] to close to call?
> I'm unable to execute anything on the client like that, unless they were > to > download a plug-in and run it on their client, which they could do, but I > doubt I could do anything with it when they finally get on the server. > > And I don't feel like exploring that too much in fear of getting a VAC ban > triggered. > > - voogru. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Eid > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 4:45 PM > To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list > Subject: Re: [hlds] to close to call? > >> >> private anti-cheat protection does have a better chance to remain > effective >> ... especially if it works. >> > > A la VAC. > > I would imagine voogru's system checks for hooks into the client.dll as > most > cheats do that. Of course, I could be wrong, only voogru would know how > voogru's system works. Using that method, however, can bring up false > positives. > > -Richard Eid > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
