Thanks Tony Good find!
KennyLoggins ClanAO.com On Feb 24, 2009, at 4:37 AM, "Tony Paloma" <[email protected]> wrote: > I was experimenting with net_splitpacket_maxrate and it seems it has a > definite noticeable effect. Assuming your server's CPU can handle > the extra > load required by splitting an extra amount of large packets and > compressing > this, I would recommend setting this to the same as your sv_maxrate > (unless > your maxrate is zero, in which case you should set it to a real high > value). > Look at these pictures: > http://www.sourceop.com/randomimages/net_splitpacket_maxrate/ > > Because of the constant stream of large amounts of incoming data, > every > packet in the screenshots is part of a fragmented set. The CVar > limits the > rate of these packets specifically and defaults to only 15000. This > is a > problem because when there is large amounts of action, it is common > for > update packets to be split because of their large size. If most of the > update packets need to be split, your rate will suddenly be dropped to > around 15,000. > > I see no drawback to increasing the value of this CVar other than the > increased CPU load your server might get since it will be splitting > and > compressing more outgoing packets. > > Hope this helps, > Tony > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
