1000FPS? Psh!

CPU In Out Uptime Users FPS Players
75.67 96016.46 448364.97 650 13 166666.81 33

Even whit out any over-boosting it seems to eat more than 50% of a core
regardless of what I do (TF2) might as well let it eat the rest. I don't
feel like hosting LFD servers.

Also on Windows the CPU difference between (While running SRCDSfpsboost)
fps_max 100 and fps_max 1000 is rather negligible:

20:06:16 fps_max 100
20:06:17 stats
20:06:17 CPU   In    Out   Uptime  Users   FPS    Players
         54.84 86277.29 250314.73    6892   138   91.05      31
20:06:21 stats
20:06:21 CPU   In    Out   Uptime  Users   FPS    Players
         54.05 87340.28 386477.72    6892   138   94.45      31
20:06:21 stats
20:06:22 CPU   In    Out   Uptime  Users   FPS    Players
         68.23 87160.87 394454.03    6892   138   94.76      31
20:06:22 stats
20:06:22 CPU   In    Out   Uptime  Users   FPS    Players
         68.23 86848.77 395059.44    6892   138   91.78      31
20:06:22 stats
20:06:22 CPU   In    Out   Uptime  Users   FPS    Players
         68.23 86340.65 393004.97    6892   138   96.67      31

20:07:11 fps_max 0
20:07:11 stats
20:07:11 CPU   In    Out   Uptime  Users   FPS    Players
         64.58 96990.05 288545.72    6893   138 1000.00      31
20:07:12 stats
20:07:12 CPU   In    Out   Uptime  Users   FPS    Players
         65.41 98352.31 292479.31    6893   138 1000.00      31
20:07:12 stats
20:07:12 CPU   In    Out   Uptime  Users   FPS    Players
         65.41 97944.08 294415.56    6893   138  881.62      31
20:07:13 stats
20:07:13 CPU   In    Out   Uptime  Users   FPS    Players
         68.47 96979.12 295715.63    6893   138  346.00      31

20:07:24 fps_max 1000
20:07:25 stats
20:07:26 CPU   In    Out   Uptime  Users   FPS    Players
         67.96 91608.16 271600.56    6893   138  624.61      31
20:07:27 stats
20:07:27 CPU   In    Out   Uptime  Users   FPS    Players
         55.38 91681.72 269726.19    6893   138  378.76      31
20:07:27 stats
20:07:27 CPU   In    Out   Uptime  Users   FPS    Players
         55.38 91458.04 271807.22    6893   138  834.93      31
20:07:28 stats
20:07:28 CPU   In    Out   Uptime  Users   FPS    Players
         55.38 90609.25 278518.06    6893   138  435.75      31

Taken from my DODS server.

Try it out yourself, be sure to have SRCDSfpsboost running. So if  you boost
your window's server why wouldn't you use fps_max 0? It makes for higher
numbers!

On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Matthew Gottlieb <
[email protected]> wrote:

> 1000FPS? n00bs!
> You clearly haven't seen the 2000FPS servers (I so WISH I was kidding...)
>
> I played TF2 on a server running at 20FPS without any problems.  I don't
> see
> why people bother with 1000FPS servers.  However you can sell a 1000FPS
> server for a crapload of money...
>
> But back to topic, L4D has a low capped FPS.
>
> ~ Mooga
>
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 6:44 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Quoting Blood Letter <[email protected]>:
> >
> >
> > Okay I already own this server with 2008
> >
> > I agree with you.  I run 5 l4d servers and use 1.9 Gigs of my ram. But
> > I dont think I ever used more then 40% of the CPU  So I agree that I
> > need more ram.  So I am about to cancel this one and order the lower
> > package which is an X2(2 x 2.3 GHz)  with 4 gigs I think that would be
> > more value for my money.
> >
> > I have another question snice it seems you guys are in a good mood
> tonight.
> >
> > How bad is to overload little bit? What I mean is if I have 100 megs
> > of ram left and I start another L4d server using ~ 200 megs (Assume
> > these are all public l4d servers) Is it okay to over load the ram like
> > that?
> >
> > >
> > > Are you joking?
> > > I ran 4 L4D servers on an old dual core athlon, and it never got
> > > over 50% CPU usage.
> > >
> > > L4D does not tax the CPU at all, despite all the hype about the
> > > amazingly complex (yeah, right) AI Director.
> > >
> > > "1000 FPS!!!" servers are a joke.
> > >
> > >> Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 16:23:36 -0800
> > >> From: [email protected]
> > >> To: [email protected]
> > >> Subject: Re: [hlds] 2003 or 2008
> > >>
> > >> 4-5 concurrently.  I think your RAM is fine since your CPU is so
> small.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> [email protected] wrote:
> > >> > Well let me ask you this.
> > >> >
> > >> > How many l4d servers to you think I can run on this box with
> > 2003/2008?
> > >> >
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> > >> archives, please visit:
> > >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Windows Live™ Contacts: Organize your contact list.
> > >
> >
> http://windowslive.com/connect/post/marcusatmicrosoft.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns!503D1D86EBB2B53C!2285.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_UGC_Contacts_032009<http://windowslive.com/connect/post/marcusatmicrosoft.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns%21503D1D86EBB2B53C%212285.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_UGC_Contacts_032009>
> <
> http://windowslive.com/connect/post/marcusatmicrosoft.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns%21503D1D86EBB2B53C%212285.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_UGC_Contacts_032009
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> > > archives, please visit:
> > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to