Lol. I'll give you that.

The chances of that happening are pretty slim, the chances of dropping a
server as you pull it out of the rack is probably has about the same chance
to fall as a server sitting on a shelf.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of DontWannaName!
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 2:12 AM
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds] Win2k versus 2003 versus 2008 on older hardware

" it is
allot cheaper to build a tower in most cases than a rack mount server"

Until it falls off the Baker shelve :P

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Lane Eckley <[email protected]> wrote:

> Lol. They are called Bakers shelves and they are more or less industry
> standard for datacenters where the cost of space is less than what it is
> worth to purchase rack mount servers.
>
> Take a look around at collocation and you will find them everywhere, it is
> allot cheaper to build a tower in most cases than a rack mount server. So
> in
> comes baker shelves.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of DontWannaName!
> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 1:53 AM
> To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
> Subject: Re: [hlds] Win2k versus 2003 versus 2008 on older hardware
>
> They would probably find a way to put it upright so it falls off their
> costco bought racks. That host is just begging for the word sketchy.
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Matt Stanton <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hahahah!  I think you've probably got bigger problems associated with a
> > datacenter being in a major earthquake than whether your server fell off
> > the rack.  Besides, wouldn't you just send them a nice 1U rack-mount
> > server?
> >
> > DontWannaName! wrote:
> > > Sorry to go off topic, but if there was a really big earthquake
wouldnt
> > all
> > > the servers fall down off the racks, if you look at the live cam it
> shows
> > > how tip-able they are.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Derek Denholm <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature
> database 4445 (20090921) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature
> database 4445 (20090921) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4445 (20090921) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com


 

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4445 (20090921) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com
 


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to