HLGuard doesn't catch, it only blocks, and runs a couple cvar checks.
P.S.: Try not to start a new thread by replying to an older message, and
snipping the older message may prove useful too. And a question mark in the
subject line could also be nice.
MoD,
Always @ your service.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Vagnoni XO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 3:13 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] HLGUARD & VAC Are Both Really Necessary
> Dear All;
>
> First I'll like to thank everyone who responded to me privately reagrding
my
> backup issue. I ended up taking peoples advice and doing the ADR2.60U2LVD
> thang. Again thanks.
>
> Second, on my server I've been lately running both hlguard and vac. When a
> cheater gets caught by either program I have their information
automatcially
> posted to a web page using dns-tommies hlstats cheater plugin.
>
> I never see hlguard catch anyone, just vac cheats. So I ask you is running
> both really necessary and I run hlguard using #15 level. It just seems to
me
> that you are adding extra reasons for lag and server load by running both
of
> them.
>
> http://system4.v-system.net/cheat.php
>
>
> If hlgaurd doesn't catch someone soon it's going to be removed from the
> server.
>
> This was the result for all of the following version of hlguard:
>
> HLguard 1.01
> HLguard 1.05
> HLguard 1.07
>
> It seems to me the VAC is enough though I could be wrong and if people
> disagree with me then right isn't it catching anyone?
>
> Sincerely
>
> Brian
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
