yeah, freebsd is great for inet servers for sure.   the only reason i dont
use it for our lan servers is that fbsd limits the server fps to like 50
(or, it used to at least)  do a host_speeds 1 in your console, and see what
happens.

kev

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Oscar N
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 5:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Linux, FreeBSD, Windows 2000, Latency test


On our dual pIII computer with linux we run two 18 player servers that
are full all the time. The ping has been around 70-80ms in-game lately
for most of our players. After I installed FreeBSD they suddenly had
around 50ms latency in-game !?! And that was even after I added HLGuard
which was not installed on linux...
So I've spend most of the day to install FreeBSD instead of linux on all
of our servers. I also like the way you can install  software with
ports, I might even change to FreeBSD on my laptop :)

Well, this is the end of the �ber high-tech test. The conclusion is to
switch to FreeBSD ;)

/Oscar, www.bhood.nu

Kevin J. Anderson wrote:

>yeah, ive always thought it would be great if someone made a way to have
>bots join a remote server.  there would be obvious cheat ramifications, but
>if there was a server side setting that would only allow them to join when
>say sv_cheats 1 was enabled, it would make for a great way to benchmark
>servers.   I myself could realllly use this, as I help run a pretty large
>lanparty, and so far I have been extremely conservative in how many tourney
>games I run per dual system. (4 x 10player servers only)  I know I could
>host more, but I want the tourney matches to be flawless, and so far
>everyone has had nothing but compliments as to the quality of the servers.
>
>kev
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of m0gely
>Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 12:47 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Linux, FreeBSD, Windows 2000, Latency test
>
>
>Imraan Sathar wrote:
>
>
>>The other thing to think about is running more than one server...
>>Something I forgot to add in my last post was that I have noticed that
>>as it stands FreeBSD seems to give higher ingame pings - even gamespy
>>pings when you run more than one server over its Windows 2000
>>equivalent.
>>
>>Anyone else noticed this?
>>
>>Max
>>
>>
>
>This is why it would be helpful to have a benchmark script for
>hl/cs/etc.  something that can be set up and measured in real world
>conditions, or best effort.  like a server w/ not just one connection
>(player) but as many as you want.  diff os's may stress differently
>under load.
>
>--
>- m0gely
>http://quake2.telestream.com/
>Q2 | Q3A | Counter-strike
>
>_______________________________________________
>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>please visit:
>http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
>_______________________________________________
>To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
>http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
>



_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to