On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 12:34, James Clark wrote: > > > > I may be biased, but I don't think that's a good idea until VAC is > > > > 100% accurate > > > > > > I agree. > > > > > > > (which is highly improbably of ever becoming a reality.) > > > > > > I don't agree. > > > > > > > Then im sure youd be able to name 1 piece of software that is 100% > > secure and foolproof. > > The argument wasn't about what is secure or foolproof. >
The 'discussion' was regarding vac's accuracy, and your claim it could be 100% accurate 1 day. To be 100% accurate, it would require it being 100% foolproof and 100% secure. > > Oh, you cant, nevermind then. > > Windows 95. bwahahha. GG _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
