On Thursday 19 June 2003 15:05, Stefan Huszics wrote: > > Perhaps :) > Not knowledgable enough about neither xfs nor UFS2 to even have an > opinion in what would be the most apropriate match in features of xfs > and reiser. I do know however that reizer blows the soccs off ext3 in > benchmarks, so performance comparrisons with ext3 is pretty much a moot > point, since it's well on the way to be replaced (eg Gentoo has had > reiser as recomended default filesystem for several months already) :) >
Could you in simple terms explain to me why its better? I mean, I know its better, but would it increase my servers performance? Sorry to be n00b here, but I've never given any thought to the filesystem in my years of using linux. -Rene -- Insert Clever Remark Here _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
