-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] i completley agree, i the only downside to xfs is it's extremly slow at deleting alot of small files, infact i used to run statsme from UA and the scanning of the log files was about 75% faster than ext3 and reiserfs, UFS on freebsd is even slower than ext2 fot this, i would use XFS if i was you.
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 23:22, Balint Laszlo BILLER wrote: > The best solution I think is xfs by SGI. It's included in the Alan Coxs' > patches (-ac). > It's robust, fast (much faster than ext2/3, faster ran reiserfs), reliable > and we never had problems with it. It's suitable for big and many small > files too. > > Voodooman > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux -------------- A [golf] ball hitting a tree shall be deemed not to have hit the tree. Hitting a tree is simply bad luck and has no place in a scientific game. The player should estimate the distance the ball would have traveled if it had not hit the tree and play the ball from there, preferably atop a nice firm tuft of grass. -- Donald A. Metz -------------- Nicholas Hockey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
