I've just recompiled my 2.6.0 kernel removing IO-APIC and notice no
difference.  The only thing else i'm doing different is that have disabled
loadable module support, and i've got my ethernet drivers, ide etc.. all
compiled in.  I'll see about trying a 2.4.9 kernel this way, and i'll see if
I can track down just what patches RH made to their version of this kernel.

James

----- Original Message -----
From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 6:24 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] CPU load


> rpm -qa|grep glibc
> glibc-common-2.2.5-43
> glibc-kernheaders-2.4-7.16
> glibc-2.2.5-43
> compat-glibc-6.2-2.1.3.2
> glibc-devel-2.2.5-43
>
> It's actually a RH 7.3 box.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "James Couzens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 8:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] CPU load
>
>
> > Please submit your GLIBC version, I'm assuming you are running rh 8?
> >
> > james
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 5:56 PM
> > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] CPU load
> >
> >
> > > Btw, here's the server at 18 players:
> > >
> > >   PID USER     PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM   TIME COMMAND
> > > 18849 hlds    14   0 57628  56M  5280 R     7.7 11.2   1:08 hlds_i686
> > >
> > > This is a 2Ghz P4, 512mb ram, running the kernel mentioned below
(which
> I
> > > call generic because it came straight from an RPM, not custom compiled
> or
> > > otherwise stripped down).
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "DLinkOZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 7:49 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] CPU load
> > >
> > >
> > > > This brings up the old question of kernel version.  I've only cut 2
of
> > my
> > > > servers over so far, and only one has seen any significant amount of
> > > traffic
> > > > since then... but at 14 players it was only consuming .5 to a max of
> 4%
> > of
> > > a
> > > > 2Ghz P4.  As I mentioned probably a year ago on this list, I firmly
> > > believe
> > > > the 2.4.9 variety of kernel to be the absolute best for serving game
> > > > servers.  And after viewing some of the top output from others on
this
> > > list
> > > > today I still stand behind my generic 2.4.9-34 kernel.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Donald Maner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 7:45 PM
> > > > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] CPU load
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Everyone, don't for one second think that an Athlon helps.
> > > > >
> > > > > 11808 donjr     25   0 89588  87M  5544 R    95.8  8.7  82:57
> hlds_amd
> > > > >
> > > > > 95.8%!!!  Yes, it's a spike, but I can't run any other games on
this
> > > > > machine.  It's an Athlon 2000+.
> > > > >
> > > > > 16 slot awp/aim/iceworld.  Only has PC133 RAM, so that might have
> > > > > something to do with it.  I'm gonna compile a clean 2.4.22 kernel
> for
> > > > > the box and see if that makes any difference.
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Didier Fronteau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 6:55 PM
> > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] CPU load
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > de_dust with 20 active players, ranges from 40% to 55%
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > P4 2.4, redhat 7.3, krn=2.4.19, 1024DDR
> > > > > (no pingboost or ticrate)
> > > > > Admin-Mod v2.50.57-beta, no extra plugins
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Kevin J. Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 5:24 PM
> > > > > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] CPU load
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > dust2 16players: 76% on amd 1.2ghz tbird.  Gentoo 1.4 glibc
2.3.2
> > > > > > hlds_amd
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> archives,
> > > > > please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> archives,
> > > > please visit:
> > > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
archives,
> > > please visit:
> > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please visit:
> > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>



_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to