James, > It's an established fact that windows can be very inaccurate when > reporting CPU usage. I myself have also seen this happen.
Another blanket statement? Can we stop just making statements and not backing them up? To me, thats not established at all, in fact, I've never read or come across anything that would leave me to disbelieve a windows machine when telling me cpu use. > You may well have lower CPU usage with 2.4.9 - however 2% cpu usage for > a 16 player server is simply INCORRECT. There is no point debating this > fact! > 2% is laughable. You state that it is incorrect, but then you do not back this information up. I am attempting to back up every statement that I am making here, and you simply refute them with, a big fat nothing. Instead of continuing to make useless replies to these messages, do everyone a favour, and prove me wrong. I will be more than happy to conceed on this subject if someone can just supply some answers. And there is point debating this fact. If I could run a 16 player cstrike server (allbeit 1.3) on an AMD K62-250 at ~40-50% cpu, what is to say, that I can not run the same server at negligable mounts of cpu on a processor thats 8 times faster, with a memory bus thats 4 times faster, and has had substantial improvements in architecture? Why is that just so ludacris to you? If you find my previous post regarding dod useage even remotely believeable, they were achieved using the same method to attain those counter-strike results. James _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
