Man, damned if you do, damned if you don't.  Valve doesn't do regular VAC
updates, people complain.  They start doing regular VAC updates and yet people
*still* complain.

Why don't you just sit back and be greatful that more cheaters are getting
caught more than ever rather than complain that you don't know which hacks are
being caught.  Also, why make it easier to the cheaters by straight telling
them what is detected and how?

*sigh*

Nick, I just want to thank you for all your efforts in revitalizing VAC.  They
do not go unappreciated or unnoticed.

Patrick

Quoting Joe Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Para wrote:
>
> > The massive Updates of VAC seems to be a dream to me, but because of
> > this, I was thinking about a list of wishes about VAC, that will make
> > all admins and all players happy.
>
> > - Updates at least weekly
> >   Keep Vac alive and make regulary updates. At least once a week! I
> > compare AntiCheatingPrograms with AntiVirusPrograms and nothing is less
> > senseless as AV with obsolte detections. This is the same with
> > AntiCheating. Regulary Updates are neccesary and nothing else will help.
>
> Personally I would like to see a great deal more transparency from VALVe
> on what cheats are detected/blocked and how.
>
> While it's refreshing to finally see VALVe getting their act together
> and keeping VAC regularly updated (I'm inclined to think too little too
> late, but I'm just cynical like that) and giving us notification of said
> updates, I feel that a message such as:
>
> "* Several new cheat detections added."
>
> Is basically meaningless. It gives us nothing as admins to tell us
> you're detecting new cheats... we need to know *what* cheats so that we
> can (a) Be aware of what VAC catches and (b) know what cheat behaviour
> to look out for (the non-detected remainder)
>
> This 'security through obscurity' approach to cheat detection/prevention
> is basically rubbish.
>
> I can *guarantee you* that the cheating community help each other keep
> abreast of exactly what VAC catches and what it doesn't and communicate
> this at lightning speed.
>
> Server admins, on the other hand, are treated like mushrooms (kept in
> the dark and fed manure). We have to go and 'investigate' the cheat
> sites to know what the software that *we* run is capable of doing...
> because the manufacturer won't tell us. Idiotic.
>
> I feel that it's about time VALVe started to realise that us server
> operators are essential business *partners*, with the associated
> necessity of treating us with respect instead of treating us like funghii.
>
> joev.
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
> visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>




-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to