Ive been using amxmodx exclusively on my servers, explaining to customers
that AMX was an dead project seeing as how OLO wasnt on the project and no
more development was being done on it. Stability hasnt been a problem. And
as for metamod, metamod has been continued to be worked upon.

What would you prefer to use?

AMXmodX- new blood, enthusiastic about the project, updates, etc

or

AMX - old, the developer quit work on it for how long? (hes bored with the
project), updated rarely....

AMXX is much more noob friendly (amxmodmenu command from console gives
access to all the commands via a menu, how easy can that be?) , and if I
read correctly AMX went back to .9.3 module style where you had to declare
it in module.ini and metamods plugin.ini ?

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of m0gely
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 11:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [AMX] AMX 0.9.9 has been released


Philip Lorenz wrote:
> I'm wondering when they'll release the source. I personally prefer the
> amxmodx "fork" of this project as its developers are putting a lot of
> effort in informing the masses on what is going on and syncing their
> work with the cvs regularly.

This is planned.  I will post back when I have more details.

--
- m0gely
http://quake2.telestream.com/
Q2 | Q3A | Counter-strike

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux





_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to