[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ive been using amxmodx exclusively on my servers, explaining to customers that AMX was an dead project seeing as how OLO wasnt on the project and no more development was being done on it. Stability hasnt been a problem. And as for metamod, metamod has been continued to be worked upon.
What would you prefer to use?
What I prefer, I run on my own servers. What you prefer should be your own decision.
AMX - old, the developer quit work on it for how long? (hes bored with the project), updated rarely....
This happened to Metamod as well and isn't uncommon. This is a game. People get bored as you said, also some grown up. It's not hard to imagine alot of the coding talent is found in the youth who play the games.
AMXX is much more noob friendly (amxmodmenu command from console gives access to all the commands via a menu, how easy can that be?)
Being that AMX has the amxmodmenu (or did you think the AMXx team invented that) I'm not sure how you can fairly make that statement.
read correctly AMX went back to .9.3 module style where you had to declare it in module.ini and metamods plugin.ini ?
This assumes that the move to go back to the older method was a bad one. In fact, declaring the modules only in the modules.ini was a dirty hack. AMXx also uses a little bit of hackery. If I understand what they've done, it's something like loading Metamod twice to hide the AMXx modules from being seen in 'meta list'. Again, if I am correct, this isn't efficient. Going back to the 0.9.3 method for 0.9.9 is much cleaner and better for code sanity.
-- - m0gely http://quake2.telestream.com/ Q2 | Q3A | Counter-strike
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
