Umm, correct me if I am wrong, but 1000hz, does it have anything to do with refresh rates on a client machine? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 10:29 AM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] OT funny (was: My server load of a FULL 64 PUB)
> Overclocking the kernel? Then why does the 2.6 kernel come with HZ at 1000 > as standard, and why have RedHat been sending out their kernels at 512Hz for > ages now? > > Although 300 is probably fine for one server, which is surely all that can > be hosted well if they're decent sizes on an XP 1800+? Maybe two servers? > > Chris Adams > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "PomidorOFF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 3:06 PM > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] OT funny (was: My server load of a FULL 64 PUB) > > > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 09:27:07AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > >> I was wondering, why do you guys set kernel Hz to 1000? Standard > monitors only > > >> support 75 Hz for refreshing frames... highest I've seen is 100 Hz. > > > > LOL ROTFL > > > > Hz=1000 - this is overclocking kernel > > IMXO 1000 too big, i set it HZ=300 > > Athlon XP 1800+ > > > > -- > > SORRY FOR MY ENGLISH > > PomidorOFF mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
