kama zei:
> I have used FreeBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD. Mostly FreeBSD the last couple of
> years... Been running cs-servers on FreeBSD for aprox 5 years now.

Well, then you should know that the first post was not reality based.

My initial reply wasn't the nicest possible, however I felt that the
contribution you made with your post wasn't very helpfull. In case you had
real intentions of helping with it, I appologise.

> Also, in the most of the independent tests Ive seen, FreeBSD is faster
> than other BSD's (and Linuxes). Espesially when it comes to concurrent
> connections NetBSD drops like a bomb. You are maybe right that 2.0 is
> gonna be sweet and all that. But thats not the situation right now. Atm
> FreeBSD is the fastest BSD on x86.

http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/#netbsd2

However, it's indeed still beta, and no, I'm not here to throw mud at
others nor to make holywars about the 'best' BSD. It differs for all
people, and on the maintainer of the machine.

> While you are waiting for 2.0 I am waiting for 5.3... I would guess that
> 5.3 will outperform 2.0...

We'll see :-)

mvg,

Wouter

--
Wouter Schoot ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Website: http://www.schoot.org
UIN# 42109851



_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to