--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
DLL is for Windows.
SO is for linux.
On 2/14/07, linux penguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is it possible to implement EasyAntiCheat onto a linux server? Is that
> what the .dll files are for?
> On 2/14/07, linux penguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Alright ill use a 64 bit OS with a 32 bit binary then.
> >
> > On 2/14/07, Valtteri Kiviniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Oh my god...
> > >
> > > Did you consider that maybe they run their servers on 64bit
because of
> > > better berformance. VAC1 is poor anticheat anyway, so think
that you
> > > were a server provider, what would you do yourself:
> > >
> > > - Host 64bit servers with best performance, best hitreg and low
CPU
> usage
> > > - Host 32bit servers with lower performance, VAC2 enabled and
high CPU
> usage
> > >
> > > Please, use some other anticheat, VAC is the primary anticheat
on CS
> so
> > > that makes it the most hacked one.. No matter what you ever do, it
> > > always have secure hacks.
> > >
> > > Or then just code your own anticheat, like we did -->
> > > www.EasyAntiCheat.com/Readme.txt
> > >
> > >
> > > Pete kirjoitti:
> > > > It's funny that 64bit binaries aren't supported, yet e-frag
STILL
> use
> > > > them.
> > > > Servers of a friends haven't had
> > > > VAC on them for well over a week now and e-frag won't fix it.
They
> claim
> > > > it's "VALVEs problem"... Yet i've told
> > > > my friend, tell them it's THEIR problem and they need to use
32bit
> > > > binaries.
> > > > Server companies who know
> > > > jack about how to run the server properly annoy me so much. I
got
> banned
> > > > from their silly forums because
> > > > I told them how to fix the error, but they don't like being told
> what is
> > > > right. Just like to let paying customers
> > > > suffer by having terrible support and no VAC of any sort on
their
> > > > servers.
> > > > Sort it out e-frag, your servers should
> > > > be using VAC2, that means using 32bit binaries!
> > > >
> > > > and LinuxPenguin... unlucky on that matter, I think vac is
totally
> > > > dead now.
> > > > So it's 32bit all the way.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "linux penguin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: <[email protected]>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 11:11 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Speakeasy security module wont load no
> > > > matter what
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> --
> > > >> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> > > >> So if i run 32 bit binary on a AMD64(with a 64 bit OS) is that
> gonna
> > > >> downgrade the performance of my hlds server?
> > > >>
> > > >> On 2/14/07, Ben Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> You can only run a 32-bit binary on a 32-bit OS... a 64-bit
binary
> will
> > > >>> ONLY
> > > >>> work on a 64-bit OS with a 64-bit processor.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > > >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Andrew
> > > >>> Forsberg
> > > >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 5:46 PM
> > > >>> To: [email protected]
> > > >>> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Speakeasy security module wont
load no
> matter
> > > >>> what
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ----- Original Message -----
> > > >>> From: "linux penguin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >>> ....
> > > >>> Some ppl said here that its better to run the 32 bit binary
on a
> 32 bit
> > > >>> OS.
> > > >>> True/False?
> > > >>> ---
> > > >>>
> > > >>> False, imo. At least your OS and any supporting processes
will
> gain
> > > >>> whatever advantages there are from a 64bit processor.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> archives,
> > > >>> please visit:
> > > >>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> __________ NOD32 2058 (20070213) Information __________
> > > >>>
> > > >>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> > > >>> http://www.eset.com
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> archives,
> > > >>> please visit:
> > > >>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > > >>>
> > > >> --
> > > >>
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> archives,
> > > >> please visit:
> > > >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> archives,
> > > > please visit:
> > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
archives,
> please visit:
> > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
--
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
