-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] He asked all the questions in here. Just look at the previous posts. We all have to start somewhere though...whether it be RTFM or not. Some people get more out of experience than a manual...but it is nice to have a manual handy to skim once in a while.
On 2/14/07, Whisper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -- > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > How did you ever learn to get linux working without learning how to RTFM > FFS?? > > On 2/15/07, linux penguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I know but i saw some dlls in my server dir., theres also a dlls > > folder i believe(cant remember im at college at the moment). > > I just now thaught what if i use Wine? Anyone tried it? Works as it > > should? > > > > On 2/14/07, Cc2iscooL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -- > > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > > DLL is for Windows. > > > > > > SO is for linux. > > > > > > On 2/14/07, linux penguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Is it possible to implement EasyAntiCheat onto a linux server? Is > that > > > > what the .dll files are for? > > > > On 2/14/07, linux penguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Alright ill use a 64 bit OS with a 32 bit binary then. > > > > > > > > > > On 2/14/07, Valtteri Kiviniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Oh my god... > > > > > > > > > > > > Did you consider that maybe they run their servers on 64bit > > because of > > > > > > better berformance. VAC1 is poor anticheat anyway, so think that > > you > > > > > > were a server provider, what would you do yourself: > > > > > > > > > > > > - Host 64bit servers with best performance, best hitreg and low > > CPU > > > > usage > > > > > > - Host 32bit servers with lower performance, VAC2 enabled and > high > > CPU > > > > usage > > > > > > > > > > > > Please, use some other anticheat, VAC is the primary anticheat > on > > CS > > > > so > > > > > > that makes it the most hacked one.. No matter what you ever do, > it > > > > > > always have secure hacks. > > > > > > > > > > > > Or then just code your own anticheat, like we did --> > > > > > > www.EasyAntiCheat.com/Readme.txt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pete kirjoitti: > > > > > > > It's funny that 64bit binaries aren't supported, yet e-frag > > STILL > > > > use > > > > > > > them. > > > > > > > Servers of a friends haven't had > > > > > > > VAC on them for well over a week now and e-frag won't fix it. > > They > > > > claim > > > > > > > it's "VALVEs problem"... Yet i've told > > > > > > > my friend, tell them it's THEIR problem and they need to use > > 32bit > > > > > > > binaries. > > > > > > > Server companies who know > > > > > > > jack about how to run the server properly annoy me so much. I > > got > > > > banned > > > > > > > from their silly forums because > > > > > > > I told them how to fix the error, but they don't like being > told > > > > what is > > > > > > > right. Just like to let paying customers > > > > > > > suffer by having terrible support and no VAC of any sort on > > their > > > > > > > servers. > > > > > > > Sort it out e-frag, your servers should > > > > > > > be using VAC2, that means using 32bit binaries! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and LinuxPenguin... unlucky on that matter, I think vac is > > totally > > > > > > > dead now. > > > > > > > So it's 32bit all the way. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > From: "linux penguin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > To: <[email protected]> > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 11:11 AM > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Speakeasy security module wont load > no > > > > > > > matter what > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > > >> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > > > > > >> So if i run 32 bit binary on a AMD64(with a 64 bit OS) is > that > > > > gonna > > > > > > >> downgrade the performance of my hlds server? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On 2/14/07, Ben Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> You can only run a 32-bit binary on a 32-bit OS... a 64-bit > > binary > > > > will > > > > > > >>> ONLY > > > > > > >>> work on a 64-bit OS with a 64-bit processor. > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> -----Original Message----- > > > > > > >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > >>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of > > > > Andrew > > > > > > >>> Forsberg > > > > > > >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 5:46 PM > > > > > > >>> To: [email protected] > > > > > > >>> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Speakeasy security module wont > load > > no > > > > matter > > > > > > >>> what > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > >>> From: "linux penguin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > >>> .... > > > > > > >>> Some ppl said here that its better to run the 32 bit binary > on > > a > > > > 32 bit > > > > > > >>> OS. > > > > > > >>> True/False? > > > > > > >>> --- > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> False, imo. At least your OS and any supporting processes > > will > > > > gain > > > > > > >>> whatever advantages there are from a 64bit processor. > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > > > > > >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > > > archives, > > > > > > >>> please visit: > > > > > > >>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> __________ NOD32 2058 (20070213) Information __________ > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > > > > > > >>> http://www.eset.com > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > > > > > >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > > > archives, > > > > > > >>> please visit: > > > > > > >>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > > > > > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > > > archives, > > > > > > >> please visit: > > > > > > >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > > > archives, > > > > > > > please visit: > > > > > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > archives, > > > > please visit: > > > > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > archives, > > > > please visit: > > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
