I think the memtest86 version you used was either corrupt or has some
form of incompatibility with those dell boards. Interestingly those
processors are core 2 xeons, which are nice and the 3.02's that were
supposed to be in it I think probably made it in to someone's pocket as
they walked out the door, LOL (I am joking here btw).

TBH I am a bit baffled. I've never had a problem with dell hardware in
the past that wasn't pretty obvious and dell wouldn't fix. I'm sorry I
can't help any further but I would love to know what the cause turns out
to be.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Frederic
Breitwieser
Sent: 08 May 2010 15:18
To: 'Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list'
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] hlds/Centos issues.

Cc2iscooL:

>>Well, you do keep getting memory errors, I know you've said you've 
>>switched out sticks, but have you actually tried any sort of
diagnostic
program yet?

Upon your suggestion, I can now say yes, I have.  Using memtest86 off a
boot
floppy, I get a memory error right away, and it repeats for each test.
I
swapped out the memory again with the old ones, and got a memory error
right
away, in the exact same spot.

I powered down another server, yanked it's memory, shoved it in, got a
memory error again in the exact same spot.

So, I went on a memory-swapping, memory testing bonanza on all 16
servers,
since the time I was doing this was in the green zone (i.e not the
production day).

Every server had memory errors, somewhere, regardless of memory, etc.
So I
pulled out of storage a brand new, never used Dell 1750 motherboard and
put
a pair of brand new, never used 1gb sticks (from Dell, in the Dell
packaging) on that, ran memtest86, and it failed too.

::headscratch::

I booted every PC in the shop with memtest86, and every one of them
failed
the test also.  Now I'm suspect of that testing program.  I shared all
this
because I thought maybe you'd find this humorous.  I did until I had to
reassemble everything back the way was at 2am :)


Dave Williams:
>>I would be interested to see what the kernel actually thinks the 
>>processor/processors is/are and what processor specific options 
>>are being loaded. Just a random thought.

Fair question, but it seems Centos believes the processors to be Genuine
Intel.  When I listed it out it showed four processors (two per core I
imagine) but I only pasted one here to keep the message somewhat short.
The
result was a surprise because one of my techs who is no longer with us
had
upgraded this machine to 3.02Ghz processors.  Seems they didn't make it
into
the machine !?!?

cat /proc/cpuinfo

processor       : 3
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 15
model           : 2
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz
stepping        : 9
cpu MHz         : 2385.596
cache size      : 512 KB
physical id     : 3
siblings        : 2
core id         : 0
cpu cores       : 1
apicid          : 7
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 2
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca
cmov
pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe cid xtpr
bogomips        : 4770.10


---

If I goggle for "hlds_run line 321" I get no shortage of hits, and it
seems
a lot of folks are having this problem in recent months with not to many
solutions.  I wonder if steam/valve know about this or if those of us
with
this issue just have unhappy hardware/OS.  I found the linux engine 53
binaries and copied them over, and got the same results, thinking going
back
one version might help.

I tried this on another Dell server, and got the same results.  Same if
I
force the amd, i484 or i686 binaries to load, either server.

This morning I pulled a Compaq DL580 out of the "to scrap" pile and ran
the
same version of memtest86 as above, and the machine passed 100% despite
it's
vintage.  Hooray Compaq.  I get Linux on it this afternoon and continue
testing.

The sad thing is I used to run several hlds-linux servers when day of
defeat
first came out as a mod to go over halflife, and wasn't a steam game.
You
know, the old won-id network and all that.

It's too bad steam keeps their software in binary form, a lot of
problems
can be resolved by compiling server daemons on the server it is to run
on.


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to