What we should be doing is pushing our ISPs to support IPv6 so that all devices will have static addresses again. No need for NAT.
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Carl <[email protected]> wrote: > You're thinking of NAT. > > Sent from my telnet. > > > > Guy Watkins wrote: > >> If not for dhcp, we would have run out of IP addresses over 10 years ago! >> >> } -----Original Message----- >> } From: [email protected] [mailto:hlds_linux- >> } [email protected]] On Behalf Of Harry Strongburg >> } Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2010 1:04 PM >> } To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list >> } Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] STEAM_0:0:1 >> } } On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 07:54:39PM +0300, Bajdechi Nightbox Alexandru >> } wrote: >> } > Imo Dynamic IPs should be banned. Who had this terrible idea to invent >> } them >> } } ISPs who do not want their customers to run static servers. It's also >> } easier to manage for them (just using DHCP to assign IPs to customers is >> } easier than giving static ones). >> } } _______________________________________________ >> } To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> } please visit: >> } http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
