Kernel that euna on 100hz o 250 instead of 1000hz will consume less cpu but runs like crap. For example on tf2, ticktrate wont be higher than ~45 with 250hz ans with 100hz on css, there is noticeable lag in the air. I'm not sure how this affects in cs 1.6.
-ics ----- Alkuperäinen viesti ----- > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 9:01 AM, hs style <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2. Debian 6.0 64 bit and 32 squeeze, what is the best kernel > > 100/250/1000/ormorevalue ? > > I'm wondering about this myself. Are there any differences running > 1000tic server on 100/250/1000hz kernel? I'm using the debian stock > kernel (250Hz) here > > > 4. For counter-strike 1.6 server.cfg, these cvars exists ?: > > sv_maxcmdrate, sv_mincmdrate and fps_max. > > 5. If fps_max exists on server.cfg, what is the maximum value ? > > sv_maxcmdrate, sv_mincmdrate don't exist on hlds but fps_max does, > although hlds does not use it all. So it doesn't matter what set for > fps_max, hlds will ignore it. Also > https://support.steampowered.com/kb_article.php?ref=5386-HMJI-5162 > > HLDS Servers use the CVAR sys_ticrate to control how many frames per > second are rendered. > SRCDS Servers use the CVAR fps_max to control how many frames per > second are rendered. > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
