I think integrating MongoDB with Hobofields would be a nice niche, and wouldn't require migrations if what I have seen so far with MongoDB holds...
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Matt Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 12, 2010, at 4:38 PM, Owen wrote: > > >> http://yehudakatz.com/2010/01/10/activemodel-make-any-ruby-object-feel-like-activerecord/ >> >> This will be interesting as we migrate Hobo down the line.... >> > > I could see HoboFields turning (at least in part) into an ActiveModel > add-on. After all, even the NoSQL crowd ends up defining fields an awful lot > of the time (just looked at an example in MongoDB), and that would be a good > fit. > > Lifecycles could *possibly* go the same way, although there's a good deal > of permission / acting_user stuff wound through there. > > --Matt Jones > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hobo Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<hobousers%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en. > > > > -- Thanks, Owen Owen Dall Barquin International 410-991-0811--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
