Thanks for the tip; for now I'm crippling my app and making it a belongs_to relationship, but I will go the :through route once I need that functionality.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Bryan Larsen <[email protected]>wrote: > HABTM is defintely further down our priority list than has_one, so I > wouldn't expect support soon. Either reworking your models to use has_many > :through or defining your own edit forms will work -- I'm not sure which > will be more painful for you. > > Bryan > > > > Chris Apolzon wrote: > >> I've just started using Hobo, and boy is it great! I was wondering if >> anyone could make a suggestion on how to handle multi-model forms for >> a habtm relationship. The hobo built-in :accessible stuff is great, >> but since it doesn't work for habtm, I'm not sure what the best way to >> proceed is? Are habtm r/s bad enough that I should try to re-work my >> model? If that isn't possible, do I need to override the hobo edit >> form for this model and declare my own? (Maybe using >> accept_nested_attributes_for?) >> >> Thanks! >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hobo Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<hobousers%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
