I'd say adding has_many :through is easier. A tweaked line of code in each endpoint and an almost blank model (just the belongs_to statements)
On Apr 20, 10:10 am, Bryan Larsen <[email protected]> wrote: > HABTM is defintely further down our priority list than has_one, so I > wouldn't expect support soon. Either reworking your models to use > has_many :through or defining your own edit forms will work -- I'm not > sure which will be more painful for you. > > Bryan > > Chris Apolzon wrote: > > I've just started using Hobo, and boy is it great! I was wondering if > > anyone could make a suggestion on how to handle multi-model forms for > > a habtm relationship. The hobo built-in :accessible stuff is great, > > but since it doesn't work for habtm, I'm not sure what the best way to > > proceed is? Are habtm r/s bad enough that I should try to re-work my > > model? If that isn't possible, do I need to override the hobo edit > > form for this model and declare my own? (Maybe using > > accept_nested_attributes_for?) > > > Thanks! > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hobo Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
