I agree with Matt on this one. I guess the transitions should be in the same namespace. Is it possible to create a transition with the same name as a state? If not then I guess states and transitions belong here, giving us this namespace: * activerecord.attributes.<model>.lifecycle.<state|transition>*
BTW: I also had some tooltips defined for the transitions that I found handy (I sometimes output the state and/or transition as an image). These are kinda like the attribute_help namespace. If these help texts are added to the *activerecord.attribute_help.<model>.lifecycle.<state|transition>*namespace, then there is a nice symmetry to the system. ~Ronny -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
