Ok, I understand now. Thanks for the clarification. On 04/02/18 12:17, Thomas Tuerk wrote: > No, that's not at all what I suggest and I would not work this way. All > I say is that you can keep multiple source trees around without trouble. > Use this how you see fit. You need to know what your needs are and > choose an appropriate workflow. All I tried to do was point out some > options. Relocation is another one, of course. > > I do the following, which fits my needs. Yours might be quite different: > I only keep fixed versions needed for certain external (not in HOL > examples dir) projects and a more or less up-to-date development version > around. I do not tend to switch the symbolic link, just when switching > projects, but select the HOL I want to use manually for every full > rebuild. Only if I know I will mainly use a certain HOL version mostly > for some time, I switch the default. > > I do updates directly on the development version and never had trouble, > since it tends to take much less than 30 min on my machine (if I don't > build many examples). I can easily schedule this for a time slot when I > don't need HOL (e.g. lunch-time or during a meeting) and not be > interrupted in my work. Even if I want to update while working with HOL, > this is usually not an issue. While HOL rebuilds, I can continue working > interactively on some proof, I just cannot restart or load additional > theories / libs. This is for me usually not an issue for the about 5-10 > min it takes on my machine. > > Best > > Thomas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ hol-info mailing list hol-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hol-info
