Ups. Sorry please discard this mail. I made this mail,before current discussion.
(2011/10/09 7:16), Shishio Tsuchiya (shtsuchi) wrote: > Hi > I was considering whether ND proxy would be useful for homenet > environment,when Fred's presentation. > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/homenet/trac/raw-attachment/wiki/WikiStart/Homenet > Routing.pdf > > The reason are > -address usage efficiency > 2^64 host address space would be too enough for homenet. > -prefix delegation > ND proxy does not require delegate prefix to upstream router. > -Security > ND proxy would be security point. > -running code > ND proxy(RFC4389) is experimental,but there is running code. > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4389 > Especially in Japan,some vendors(maybe 2 or 3) already supported very similar > function as RA proxy. > As you may know,NTT East/West has been assigned IPv6 address for their wall > garden since Feb. 2007. > CPE supports this by two method. > -Ether-type(0x86DD) bridge,it called IPv6 path-though > -RA Proxy > > RA proxy router can inspect of IPv6 data packets as theoretical. > > I would appreciate any comments. > > Regards, > -Shishio > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet > _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
