>>>>> "Mikael" == Mikael Abrahamsson <[email protected]> writes: >> Agreed. But I think it is worth noting that nd-proxy is practical >> in mobile networks where each subscriber gets a unique /64. >> >> Mobile network attachment has popped up a few times in homenet >> discussions.
Mikael> I think ND proxy has some use even in other cases, I would
Mikael> just like to be sure that there is consensus that this won't
Mikael> scale to a home with lots and lots of devices. The number 10
Mikael> or 16 simulatenous active IPv6 addresses comes to mind,
Mikael> after that I don't want to know what they have in their home
Mikael> anymore, they'll have to route it themselves.
So, I think that most of us were thinking that proxy-ND is what the home
does when the home runs out of it's /60. I don't see why the ISP would
ever see this.
Or are you saying a mobile device (a smartphone) will only ever get a
/64 to share?
--
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.
pgp9dcyMSoKpl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
