On Oct 10, 2011, at 3:41 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: > >>>>>> "Mikael" == Mikael Abrahamsson <[email protected]> writes: >>> Agreed. But I think it is worth noting that nd-proxy is practical >>> in mobile networks where each subscriber gets a unique /64. >>> >>> Mobile network attachment has popped up a few times in homenet >>> discussions. > > Mikael> I think ND proxy has some use even in other cases, I would > Mikael> just like to be sure that there is consensus that this won't > Mikael> scale to a home with lots and lots of devices. The number 10 > Mikael> or 16 simulatenous active IPv6 addresses comes to mind, > Mikael> after that I don't want to know what they have in their home > Mikael> anymore, they'll have to route it themselves. > > So, I think that most of us were thinking that proxy-ND is what the home > does when the home runs out of it's /60. I don't see why the ISP would > ever see this. > > Or are you saying a mobile device (a smartphone) will only ever get a > /64 to share?
My (limited) understanding of the various 3/4G standards are that a PD for a phone is something that is very, very, recent. Perhaps Rajeev (cc'd) or someone else here can elucidate. - Mark > > -- > ] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls > [ > ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net > architect[ > ] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device > driver[ > Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE> > then sign the petition. > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
