On Mar 11, 2012, at 5:44 PM, Fred Baker wrote:

>
> On Mar 10, 2012, at 5:04 PM, Tim Chown wrote:
>
>> It's good to see some traction in service discovery and naming.
>>
>> We also have a fifth area, security.  The text as it stands says a few
>> things that apply to this area, e.g.
>>
>> a) An assumption of "Simple Security" with default deny on the CER.
>>   This implies PCP or uPnP to support punching holes.  The text
>>    also talks about addressability vs reachability.
>
>> d) Mention of "Advanced Security", which talks about the ability to
>>    install 3rd party policies.  Some have suggested removing this
>>    from the initial homenet spec.
>
> One of these days I'll figure out what is "advanced" about "advanced 
> security". I think the point of interest is that it can be expected to not be 
> maintained (how many people maintain their norton-or-whatever-firewall 
> contracts?) and will therefore allow a lot of stuff through.
>
> I will be doing a talk in opsawg trying to make the firewall story a little 
> less "I don't like this and I do like that", more about what a firewall does 
> and doesn't do and what models one might consider - at least three of them. 
> If there is interest in homenet, I could comment on that discussion.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-opsawg-firewalls
>  "On Firewalls in Internet Security", Fred Baker, 20-Jan-12

Any chance of having such a conversation in the Security Area WG?  I mentioned 
the debate to Sean Turner (Security AD), and he thought it would be an 
excellent topic for security experts to discuss.  However, since there had been 
no discussion on list, I did not get around to writing a draft, so I have 
nothing to submit for the agenda.

Lee


> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet


This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable 
proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to 
copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for 
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any 
dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the 
contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be 
unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender 
immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and 
any printout.
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to