>>>>> "Erik" == Erik Kline <[email protected]> writes: Erik> Mark,
Erik> For the record, the walled garden citation I quoted was from:
Erik> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3002#section-4.2
yes, I found it during the meeting.
I think you are taking it out of context of:
- the time before 2000
- when "wireless carriers" were not running IP at all, but providing
access to email/etc. via application layer gateways!!!!
and it was a summary of an IAB workshop, not an IAB recommendation.
I much prefer to engineer for walled gardens using globally unique
addresses GUA (not globally reachable) ("GUAnGR"?), than for NAT66.
I also want to point out that the experience with IPv4 "walled gardens"
usually involves either operators squatting on "unallocated" address
spaces, or enterprises running non-unique RFC1918 networks with
VPNs/Remote-Access. None of these things are going away.
The example of "Joe's web cam", and whether we should use:
- ULA/GUA in DNS with views (what about caches and DNSSEC?)
or - ULA+GUA in DNS (multiple AAAA) plus Happy Eyeballs
is pertinent. Because the ULA is a walled garden. And if it's really
"Joes' office webcam via VPN", then the Enterprise is a walled garden.
--
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.
pgpxJlSrZZkUE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
