>>>>> "Brian" == Brian E Carpenter <Brian> writes:
    Brian> Front posting: I think we are using "walled garden" to mean
    Brian> several things and that is confusing.

    Brian> In my mind it refers to a captive customer scenario where a
    Brian> service provider is intentionally limiting a customer's
    Brian> access to the global Internet or (by playing DNS and/or HTTP
    Brian> proxy tricks) presenting a distorted view of the the global
    Brian> Internet.

    Brian> This becomes especially obnoxious if the customer has
    Brian> multiple providers that attempt to enforce different walled
    Brian> gardens. But that's a MIF issue, I think.

    Brian> That is quite different from stating that a customer network
    Brian> should be separated from the Internet by a security fence of
    Brian> some kind and may also need a local namespace. I thought that
    Brian> was normally called an intranet.

I actually can't see a technical difference.
Most intranets work by:
     1) intentionally limiting a customer's access to the global Internet
     2) playing DNS tricks
     3) HTTP proxy tricks
     4) having a local name space.

I think that walled-gardens are the political NAT44 of IPv6.

We can, if we want, stick our head in the sand like we did for NAT44,
letting the marketplace produce create an arms race between network
operators and application creators.  Or, we can do like we finally did
with BEHAVE and specify something.

I'm here in homenet because I care about e2e, I want to avoid NAT66, and
I see great utility in having globably unique addresses everywhere, even
if they are not globally routable/accessible.

(ps: I shipped NAT44 products in 1994. I hate myself for helping kill
e2e. I shipped it with split-horizon DNS standard.  It was all stupid. )

-- 
]       He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
   Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
                       then sign the petition. 

Attachment: pgp2GtJIT1dfG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to